Mary Katharine Ham and me at ABC/Facebook debate

January 6, 2008 · Filed Under Feminism, Internet Media, Politics · Comment

Townhall.com’s Mary Katharine Ham and I did a video blog from the ABC/Facebook debates in New Hampshire last night.
<object height=”355″ width=”425″>
<param name=”movie” value=”http://www.youtube.com/v/woRCDE-1Fc4&rel=1″></param>
<param name=”wmode” value=”transparent”></param><embed src=”http://www.youtube.com/v/woRCDE-1Fc4&rel=1″ type=”application/x-shockwave-flash” wmode=”transparent” height=”355″ width=”425″></embed></object></p>

Tags:

Is Obama’s victory the end of gender?

January 3, 2008 · Filed Under Feminism, Politics · Comment

UPDATE: I apologize if I misquoted Lawless. I just found this quote from her clarifying the “women for vote women” argument:

Women do tend to vote for female contenders, but that doesn’t necessarily translate into a gender preference, explains Jennifer Lawless, a political scientist at Brown University who studies women candidates. What happens, she says, is that women are more likely to vote for Democrats, and women candidates are more likely to be Democrats.

Lawless believes that Clinton will actually face challenges in attracting women primary voters. For starters, all the candidates are Democrats, so the party-label advantage goes away.

“Women tend to prefer outside candidates,” Lawless says. “Hillary Clinton is not the outside candidate. She’s the establishment candidate.” Women are also more likely to back liberal candidates. “Clinton’s by far not the most liberal of the bunch.”

I do not want to overstate Iowa’s importance. But last night in Iowa, “Obama got 35 percent of women voters, compared to 30 percent for Clinton and 23 percent for Edwards. This despite the fact that Clinton focused her campaign on bringing fellow women to the polls.” I have not yet seen the age splits on these numbers, but I wonder if this signals a shift in the perception of how women vote. At any rate, Clinton’s “You go girl” message was just not enough to get a majority of women to vote for her, and that’s a good thing. My concern is that much of the political science literature, and certainly the messaging of women’s groups like EMILY’s List, indicates the women want to vote for women. You see, we read many statistics that when women are running for office, more women come out to vote*. But Iowa’s results belie this. Others aren’t surprised at Obama’s win with women.

My friend Maria, a political scientist cum consumer marketing consultant says”The excitement of first woman president I don’t think resonates with younger folks - I think it’s more of an old school feminist appeal. I think generally younger people would be more excited by Obama’s multicultural background than Hillary as a woman.”

Lisa Stone, co-founder of BlogHer who’s been covering politics for a long time, wrote: “…in every survey I’ve ever done women decry the idea of voting for a woman just because of her gender. Especially boomers.”

Over on BlogHer, Marilyn from Land of Moo commented to me: “What’s mystified me over the last year+ of this campaign is why so many women DO support Hillary. Sometimes I wonder if they’re blinded by gender. For ME (just MY opinion), she has so many negatives that her gender can’t possibly overcome them. And I’m an old-school feminist.”

If it matters, my loyalties are very torn between Hillary Clinton, who I originally supported, and Obama’s message. It is very powerful indeed. I know I’m not alone tonight in feeling torn. And I don’t want to see Bill Clinton with Hillary - I want to see and hear from Hillary alone.

I still have ’til Feb 5 to decide…

The momentum and the sheer turnout in Iowa is exciting. 212,000 + who participated in the Democratic Caucus in Iowa- up from around 125k in 2004. Very cool.

*See Lawless, Jennifer L. and Richard L. Fox. It Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005. (Public opinion on voting for a woman for President, see chart on 23).

Tags:

Looking beyond “Women for…”

January 3, 2008 · Filed Under Feminism, Internet Media, Politics · Comment

From Iowa blogger Essential Estrogen, on the day of the Iowa Caucus:

Listen to the national media long enough and you’ll soon be convinced that I’m one of the hottest commodities available in this presidential election. First, I’m a resident of Iowa. Second, I’m a woman. It is true that I was contacted by every Democratic campaign (and a couple of Republican ones as well) and asked to join their “Women for …” group. Over the summer, I spent hours in small meetings, visiting with leadership of said women’s groups. Those who participated were told that the feedback garnered from those meetings was invaluable, that the views expressed by the women involved were going to be taken back to the top of the campaign and integrated into the messaging, plans and forthcoming white papers. Some of it was. Unless the other meetings held across the state of Iowa were drastically different from the ones I attended, very little of the substance of those meetings was converted to policy.

Women who attended the meetings, even those who remain firmly committed to the candidate hosting the meeting, still sometimes wonder where that information went or if it went anywhere at all. We asked to hear about reproductive health — not just abortion, but the full gamut of reproductive health issues — and have yet to see one white paper with that title. We asked for details concerning everything from early childhood learning to veterans’ benefits to protecting family farms. We asked for a great deal. We gained very little.

Who would have guessed that the elderly woman on the Wendy’s commercial who demanded, “Where’s the beef?!” so many years ago would be so in tune with women today?

Contrary to radio entertainers who fill the day with notices of the “chickafication” of everything from the economy to the media, the best-kept secret of the women’s community is that women’s issues are human issues. We don’t just care about families, contraception, security or education.

Tags:

« Previous Page