The F-word still gets women talking
Not that F word!! I mean feminism…
On behalf of my client Legal Momentum, the nation’s oldest legal advocates for women, I’ve been asking women: How would you describe yourself?
I’m a feminist
or
I’m not a feminist, but…(fill in blank:
On Legal Momentum’s blog, celebrationofstrength.org, and on BlogHer women have mostly been saying, yes, I’m a feminist. Skewed selectionss granted (the national average of women who identify as feminists is about 25%) but I’m getting more hopeful.
My all time favorite justification for claiming the F word is from Creatively Belle on BlogHer:
“I have my own company, I have my own property, I vote, I have my university degree, I have my own mind; of course I’m a feminist.”
She hits the nail on the head. She’s not a feminist because she dislikes men or wants to steal their jobs or wishes she had a penis. She’s a feminist because she’s a whole, real adult person.
Joan Blades on BlogHers Act
It’s the last day to vote for your issue at BlogHers Act.
A hero of mine, Joan Blades (who co-founded moveon.org and momsrising.org) posted HER top issues on the MomsRising blog. I think she’s dead-on.
READ MORE: bloghers act
Sounds like my kind of initiative! So here is my post. Please consider posting comments to this blog post or on your own blog if you’ve got one. We have until Friday to let this large and extended community know what we think would be great issues for them to address next year.
The Global Issue: As a founder of MomsRising I propose that Global warming is the ultimate family issue. Parents think long term. I want my children to live in a world as beautiful or more beautiful than I do. We have scientific evidence abounding that we are putting our planet at risk. There is no doubt in my mind that we need to get serious now about correcting this problem. Some people argue about whether the evidence is strong enough to cause us to truly invest in doing things differently. My answer- “Would you allow your child to play Russian Roulette?†If the answer is “NO!†then the answer is clear. We can not take chances with our children and their children’s future.
4 presidential issues
1. Every presidential candidate should have family issues on his or her agenda this year and I think health care tops the list. Our families and our economy are struggling under the costs of health care at the same time the quality of our health care is diminishing. We are all at risk, even the wealthy, because our emergency services have so gravely undermined.
2. Candidates also need to face the fact that America does not support its (EDIT - NOT IT’S) families well. Our child mortality is 37th world wide according to the world health organization, even though we spend more per capita on health care than any other country in the world. One contributor to the sad fact is our lack of paid family leave after the birth or adoption of a new child; or for a serious illness. Few Americans realize that out of 173 countries world wide, only 4 don’t have paid leave for new mothers. Those countries are- the U.S., Swaziland, Papua New Guinea and Liberia!
3. Speaking of health and social safety nets, the U.S. is also way behind in providing paid sick days for workers. All the other top 20 industrialized nations ensure that workers have paid sick days. We do not. And this means if we ever do have a serious flu in this country we are going to have a much harder time containing it because people that can’t take paid sick days will keep working because they need to feed their children.
4. Finally any good presidential candidate must work to make sure that children get the care they need. Quality child care is out of reach for too many parents and after school programs do not begin to cover the needs of our nation’s children. Most parents have to work and this means we have 40,000 kindergarteners home alone after school, in fact a total of 14 million children are unsupervised after school. We are not investing in the next generation and we are going to pay dearly for it in years to come.
Wouldn’t it be great if all these issues were front and center this coming year?! Use the comments below to say what issues you’d like this community to get behind for a year, and what four issues you want the presidential candidates to address in order to get your vote in the ‘08 election.
And remember, this is a year-long initiative with lots of potential to have an impact on big issues of importance to all of us here at MomsRising.
Army hiring 25% more psych workers because of Iraq
Bobby Muller, help! Cross-posted from BlogHer.org:
AP reports: Overwhelmed by the number of soldiers returning from war with mental
problems, the Army is planning to hire more than 25 percent additional psychiatrists and other medical workers.
As Moondanzer (her son is in law is in Iraq) writes on Moon’s Rants and Raves
And just think it only took our great leaders 5+ years(not counting the Viet Nam nightmare) to figure this out. I only hope to God that they are also going to supply President Bush, Cheney, and Rove with a psychiatrist. Because God knows they need something!
More from the AP:
A contract finalized this week but not yet announced calls for spending $33
million to add about 200 psychiatrists, psychologists and social workers to
help soldiers with post-traumatic stress disorder and other mental health
needs, officials told The Associated Press on Thursday. Ritchie (Col. Elspeth Ritchie, psychiatry consultant to the Army surgeon general) said long and repeat deployments caused by extended wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are causing more mental strain on troops. “At the time that the war began, I don’t think anybody anticipated how long it would be going on,” she said.Surveys of troops in Iraq have shown that 15 percent to 20 percent of Army soldiers have signs and symptoms of post-traumatic stress, which can cause flashbacks of traumatic combat experiences and other severe reactions.About 35 percent of soldiers are seeking some kind of mental health treatment a year after returning home under a program that screens returning troops for physical and mental health.
As we’ve been discussing on this blog for months, this issue has been brewing for years now but like Iraq, it seems unsolvable even with additional staff. The Walter Reed scandal brought like to the dire situations of many vets, but mental health continues to be a sticky discussion point in this country, even when the numbers prove soldiers’ mental health cannot be ignored. NPR has not ignored the dire straits of many returning vets. Hat tip to Christy Hardin Smith for links to the exceptional reporting from Daniel Zwerdling has kept listeners informed of this terrible saga. Take a listen.
Americans think birth control is normal- why doesn’t our government?
Cross posted on BlogHer.org:
Today is the 42nd anniversary of the legalization of birth control in America. And while 81% of voters (see link below), male, female, red state or blue state believe in access to birth control and medically accurate sex education in public schools, listening to the leaders of this country you’d think sometimes most Americans think sex is a crime and birth control should be outlawed. Why? The agenda of a few radical activists seems to have corroded the brains of many politicians in Washington, DC.
At a briefing today to command support for the the bipartisan Prevention First Act (that would require health plans, including Medicaid, to offer the same level of coverage for contraceptives as for other prescription drugs and services. It would also mandate comprehensive sex education in schools and access to emergency contraception for rape victims and is in front of the House now) women’s rights leaders shared incredulity that polls show most Americans believe access to birth control is a basic human right and a normal value, because since the 1980’s, public policy would indicate otherwise. Recently, the Bush administration has poured billions into funding “abstinence only education,” which doesn’t work, while cutting family planning funding.
With huge respect to the feminist icons who helped bring us what rights we have today, why are you so incredulous? Maybe it’s because these leaders are all of a certain age. Ask younger women who’ve come of sexual age in an increasingly conservative nation, and I don’t think they’d be so shocked. Rather, many young year old women are just used to shelling out big bucks for the pill, or praying they won’t need emergency contraception or an abortion…if they even know it’s available, since there is so little money spent on awareness.
Eleanor Smeal and her comrades fought, then enjoyed a brief period in which Americans’ values about sexuality were vaguely in line with politicians. Not so any more.
Dr. Susan Wood, who became a hero to many sane people when she resigned as assistant commissioner for women’s health at the Food and Drug Administration to protest the FDA’s politically-driven “foot-dragging in approving emergency contraception, said most people were surprised when they learn that policymakers are opposed to birth control. “Then they become outraged,†she said.
That’s why the Prevention First Act matters: it funds better education and access to birth control for all Americans. This reduces the need for abortions. Please keep tabs on this bill, contact your leaders if relevant.
From the press release:
Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY), chair of the House Committee on Rules and a pro-choice champion, noted that conservatives are undermining Americans’ access to family planning information and services through “conscience clauses†that allow pharmacies to refuse to dispense contraceptives; funding for abstinence-only sex education; and opposition to emergency contraceptives and stem cell research. Many insurance companies do not cover the costs of family planning, she said, causing great hardship to poor women.Links to polling: www.BirthControlWatch.org: According to the BirthControlWatch.org poll, between half of voters and six in ten strongly agree that to achieve equality women must have access to birth control, that health insurance plans that cover prescription drugs should also cover birth control, and that the federal government should provide funding for birth control for women with low incomes.



